|
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
|
CRITERIA
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1. Organization & Clarity:
viewpoints & responses are outlined both clearly & orderly.
|
Unclear in most parts
|
Clear in some parts but not over all
|
Most clear & orderly in all parts
|
Completely clear & orderly
presentation
|
2. Use of Arguments:
reasons given to support viewpoint.
|
Few or no relevant reasons given
|
Some relevant reasons given
|
Most reasons given: most relevant
|
Most relevant reasons given in support
|
3. Use of Examples & Facts:
examples and facts are given to support
reasons.
|
Few or no relevant supporting
examples/facts
|
Some relevant examples/facts given
|
Many examples/facts given: most relevant
|
Many relevant supporting examples & facts given
|
4. Use of Rebuttal:
arguments made by the other teams are
responded to and dealt with effectively.
|
No effective counter-arguments made
|
Few effective counter-arguments made
|
Some effective counter-arguments made to defend your position/claim
|
Many effective counter-arguments made, responded well to objections
|
5. Presentation Style:
tone of voice, use of gestures, body language, eye contact, level of enthusiasm.
|
Few style features were used; not convincingly
|
Few style features were used
convincingly
|
All style features were used, most convincingly
|
All style features were used
convincingly
|